EVENT:

On October 24th, 2017, the AidData-hosted event, Tyranny of Averages: Are we worsening inequality within countries?, brought together Amanda Glassman (CGD), Caroline Heider (World Bank), Selim Jahan (UNDP), Kevin Croke (World Bank), Bradley C. Parks (AidData) and Samantha Custer (AidData) for an engaging panel discussion on issues of inequality and aid targeting addressed by the report. Watch the recording or read a summary of the remarks.

Journal Article

Canary in the coal mine? China, the UNGA, and the changing world order

Date Published

Feb 20, 2017

Authors

Samuel Brazys, Alexander Dukalskis

Publisher

Citation

Brazys, S., & Dukalskis, A. (2017). Canary in the coal mine? China, the UNGA, and the changing world order. Review of International Studies, 43(04), 742-764. doi:10.1017/s0260210517000067

Update: A revised version of this paper has been published in Health Economics.

Journal Article

Canary in the coal mine? China, the UNGA, and the changing world order

Date Published

Feb 20, 2017

Authors

Samuel Brazys, Alexander Dukalskis

Citation

Brazys, S., & Dukalskis, A. (2017). Canary in the coal mine? China, the UNGA, and the changing world order. Review of International Studies, 43(04), 742-764. doi:10.1017/s0260210517000067

How China assumes its position of superpower is one of the most important questions regarding global order in the twenty-first century. While considerable and sustained attention has been paid to ChinaÕs growing economic and military might, work examining how China is attempting, if at all, to influence the ecosystem of global norms is in its earlier stages. In this article we examine ChinaÕs actions in an important venue for the development of global norms, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). Using a unique dataset that captures how other countries move into or out of alignment with China on UNGA resolutions that are repeated over time, we find statistical evidence that China used diplomatic and economic means in an attempt to subtly alter international norms. We further illustrate these findings by examining four states that made substantive moves toward China on resolutions concerning national sovereignty, democracy, international order, non-interference, and human rights.

Related Publications

No items found.
No items found.

Related Posts

No items found.