Escaping the Disengagement Dilemma: Two Field Experiments on Motivating Citizens to Report on Public Services
Date Published
Nov 13, 2019
Authors
Mark T. Buntaine, Daniel L. Nielson, Jacob T. Skaggs
Publisher
British Journal of Political Science
Citation
Buntaine, M. T., Nielson, D. L., & Skaggs, J. T. (2021). Escaping the Disengagement Dilemma: Two Field Experiments on Motivating Citizens to Report on Public Services. British Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 685-705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000322
Note: A version of this article was previously published as an AidData Working Paper.
Abstract
To promote good governance, citizens can inform governments directly and routinely about the implementation of policies and the delivery of public services. Yet citizens lack incentives to provide information when they do not expect governments to be responsive, and citizen disengagement in turn often prevents governments from providing public goods effectively. In two field experiments, we studied potential remedies to this dilemma related to solid waste services in Uganda. We randomly assigned reporters to be recruited by community nomination and to be recognized by community leaders in an attempt to select for and motivate information sharing. We also randomly assigned reporters to hear from the government about how their reports were used to make real improvements to waste services. Community nominations and public announcements did not increase reporting. However, responsiveness boosted participation over several months for reporters who had been recruited earliest and had been reporting longest, highlighting the critical role of timely government responsiveness in sustaining information flows from citizens.
Featured Authors
Mark Buntaine
Assistant Professor at the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management and the Department of Political Science at the University of California at Santa Barbara
Dan Nielson
Professor and Associate Chair of Political Science at Brigham Young University