Apples and Dragon Fruits: The Determinants of Aid and Other Forms of State Financing from China to Africa
Date Published
Feb 1, 2018
Authors
Axel Dreher, Andreas Fuchs, Bradley C Parks, Austin M Strange, Michael J Tierney
Publisher
International Studies Quarterly
Citation
Dreher, A., Fuchs, A., Parks, B., Strange, A. M., & Tierney, M. J. (2018). Apples and Dragon Fruits: The Determinants of Aid and Other Forms of State Financing from China to Africa. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 182-194. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2855935
Note: A version of this article was previously published as an AidData Working Paper.
Abstract
Chinese 'aid' is a lightning rod for criticism. Policy-makers, journalists, and public intellectuals claim that Beijing uses its largesse to cement alliances with political leaders, secure access to natural resources, and create exclusive commercial opportunities for Chinese firms — all at the expense of citizens living in developing countries. We argue that much of the controversy about Chinese 'aid' stems from a failure to distinguish between China's Official Development Assistance (ODA) and more commercially oriented sources and types of state financing. Using a new database on China's official financing commitments to Africa from 2000 to 2013, we find that the allocation of Chinese ODA is driven primarily by foreign policy considerations, while economic interests better explain the distribution of less concessional flows. These results highlight the need for better measures of an increasingly diverse set of non-Western financial activities.
Featured Authors
Axel Dreher
Professor of Economics and Chair of International and Development Politics at Heidelberg University
Andreas Fuchs
Professor of Development Economics at the University of Goettingen
Austin Strange
Assistant Professor, University of Hong Kong
Mike Tierney
Co-Director of the Global Research Institute and Hylton Professor of Government and International Relations at the College of William & Mary
Bradley C. Parks
Executive Director