Reach
2017 LTLS Question 22.1
"Of the following foreign and international organizations, which, if any, provided [the government / your team] with advice or assistance to support this initiative? (Please select all that apply.)"
12.4%
of respondents who answered this question selected Australia
Official Development Assistance
23.1 billion
committed for the period 2005 to 2013 to 56 countries within the LTLS that had at least 1 respondent who reported working with Australia.
Taken from AidData’s Core Research Release, Version 3.1, development assistance is defined as the total amount of official development assistance(ODA) committed by each donor for the period 2005-2013 to those countries included within the survey and that had at least 1 respondent reporting that they had received advice or assistance from that donor. ODA is given in billions of 2011 USD.
Influence
2017 LTLS Question 22.5
"You indicated that the foreign and international organizations below provided {the government / your team } with advice or assistance. How influential were they on {Government of [Q1:Country]'s / your team's} decision to pursue this initiative? For the purposes of this survey, we define influential as the power to change or affect the policy agenda."
Overall Performance
59.6%
of 2017 LTLS evaluations in which Australia was rated had a rating of "quite influential" or "very influential".
26
out of 35 partners who had at least 30 responses each in helpfulness and influence in AidData's 2017 LTLS.
-5
change in rank from an adjusted 2014 ranking based on AidData's 2014 survey.
Ranking by Cohort
How did Australia do versus other development partners with at least 30 respondents in a particular cohort?
By Stakeholder
Government Officials:
23
out of 32
Development Partners:
12
out of 19
Australia did not have 30 evaluations in any stakeholder cohort.
By Region
East Asia and Pacific:
11
out of 15
Europe and Central Asia:
out of 14
Latin America and The Caribbean:
out of 9
Middle East and North Africa:
out of 5
Sub-Saharan Africa:
26
out of 26
Australia did not have 30 evaluations in any region.
By Sector
Australia did not have 30 evaluations in any sector.
Social/Health:
12
out of 19
Helpfulness
2017 LTLS Question 22.2
"In your opinion, how helpful were each of the following organizations to the implementation of this initiative? For the purposes of this survey, we define helpful as being of assistance in implementing policy changes?"
Overall Performance
69.8%
of 2017 LTLS evaluations in which Australia was rated had a rating of "quite helpful" or "very helpful".
21
out of 35 partners who had at least 30 responses each in helpfulness and influence in AidData's 2017 LTLS.
-3
change in rank from an adjusted 2014 ranking based on AidData's 2014 survey.
Ranking by Cohort
How did Australia do versus other development partners with at least 30 respondents in a particular cohort?
By Stakeholder
Government Officials:
23
out of 31
Development Partners:
9
out of 19
Australia did not have 30 evaluations in any stakeholder cohort.
By Region
East Asia and Pacific:
4
out of 14
Europe and Central Asia:
out of 13
Latin America and The Caribbean:
out of 9
Middle East and North Africa:
out of 4
Sub-Saharan Africa:
26
out of 26
Australia did not have 30 evaluations in any region.
By Sector
Australia did not have 30 evaluations in any sector.
Social/Health:
12
out of 16
